Pakistan Education System

Posted on May 20, 2012 by

Pakistan Education System

Education in Pakistan under the supervision of the Ministry of Education in Pakistan. Educational and governmental institutions, but especially the federal government to help in curriculum development, accreditation and funding of research.

Training in Pakistan are generally divided into five levels: primary (first through five years), intermediate (grades 6-8) and high (9 and 10 leading to a high school diploma or SSC), intermediate (grades 11 and 12 in an upper secondary school (the school) a certificate or a speed boat), universities, leading to degrees and advanced.

Illiteracy ranges from 72.38 to 10.37 percent of the region, Islamabad Musakhel. [4] From 2000 to 2004 55 to 64 years, the illiteracy rate in Pakistan, about 30% of 45-54 years were read by almost 40%, but 25 to 34 have an illiteracy rate of 50% and the age group 15-24 years of age are reading and writing more than 60%.

These data indicate that each generation of the literacy rate in Pakistan has increased by 10%. Literacy in the various regions, including sex. Literacy of women in the tribal areas of 3%. Stage of formal education

Primary

Only 63% of children complete primary education in Pakistan. Moreover, 68% of men and 72%, Pakistan, Pakistani girls reach Level 5, the standard of the national education system, based mainly on the British system. The preschool is designed for 3-5 years, usually consists of three steps: playgroups, nurseries and kindergartens (also known as “mother” or “loan”). After pre-school to high school students to walk from one year to four this year at the school include 5 to 8 schools in environmental management is the single-sex, often tend to choose the community, but co- Education is also common in cities. The course is usually affected by the institutions. Usually, eight subjects Urdu, English, math, art, science, social sciences, Islamiyat, research in computer science, sometimes including access to the computer lab. Some agencies also offer foreign language instruction in Arabic, French and Chinese. This teaching of the language depends on the nature of the institution, if schools and schools in Middle English or Urdu.

Minor

Secondary education in Pakistan since 9 th for 4 years. At the end of each school year 4, students must pass the national examination administered by a regional council of the middle and high school (or power law).

At the end of grade 9, each student must be the first part of the standardized test subjects. Once again tested, the second part of the same course at the end of the class of 10, following the success of these two studies, which specifies a secondary school certificate (SSC). This is known locally as the certificate

of registration “or” Matrix short. The course usually includes a combination of eight courses, including electives (biology and science / computer science, chemistry and physics), and the compulsory subjects (such as English, Urdu is the language, math and study Islamiyat Pakistan ).

Then students enter college and complete the intermediate 11 and 12 at the end of each year, two, and take on new standardized tests in the subjects. Following the success of these studies is the distribution of high school students (school) certificate (or high-speed boat). This level of training is also known as FSC / FA or “average.” There are many streams of students to choose their own 11 and 12 degrees, as former health care, pre-engineering, the humanities (or social sciences) and trade. Each data stream consists of three electives, required courses and 3, English, Urdu, Islamiyat (grade 11) and Pakistan Studies (Level 12).

alternative qualifications available in Pakistan, but noar maintain, rather than the power law for the review boards. The most common option is the General Certificate of Education (GCE o), where the SSC and HSC have been replaced by regular mail (or O level) and advanced level (or level), respectively. CIG replace qualifications, including South-South cooperation. Cambridge O-level, CIG, General Certificate of Education as / Cambridge level management by the British think tank and professional evaluation of the Edexcel Pearson Group. Usually, 80 to 10 courses chosen by students of GCE O level and a level of 3.5 in Cambridge.

Advanced Engineering (or AP) is another possibility, but far below the public consumption expenditures are less common or IGC. This will replace secondary education, secondary education “in its place. AP Board examinations supervised by the North American study, the College Board, which provides for monitoring of the center, registered with the College Board, the government consumption expenditure as compared to S / AS / IGC level and can be private.

Higher education

In 2003-04, only 2.9% of Pakistanis registered higher education, but this figure rose to 4.0% in 2008 (5.1% and 2.8% for men women) and 4 7% 2009th Pakistan plans to increase to 10%, this figure by 2015 and 15% in 2020.

Thereafter, the high-speed vessels, students can read the university professional degree programs of training, such as engineering (B Engg), medicine (MB BS), dentistry (BDS), veterinary medicine (DVM), law (LLB), Building Science (fabric bow) and nursing (2 Suginami). These courses are 4 or 5 years of research. Students may also participate in the University of Arts (BA), Bachelor of Science (BSc), Bachelor of Business Studies (COM fabric) or Bachelor of Business Administration (MBA).

There are two types of curricula in Pakistan: the evidence or honor. Pass degree requires two years of study, students often read three themes to choose from (such as chemistry or economics), in addition to compulsory subjects are almost the same amount (as in the United Kingdom and Pakistan Studies).

Honorary three to four years of study, students in certain disciplines, in general, and biochemistry (Biochemistry degree specialize.). It should be noted that the degree is being progressively withdrawn from the national honor.

Quaternary education

Many undergraduate courses only one year and a half. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) training can, in certain areas, often chasing the master. Doctoral students must select a specific area, a university doing research in this area. Higher education in Pakistan at least 3-5 years of study.

The gender gap

In other criticisms of the educational system of Pakistan against the gender gap in education. But in recent years some progress, try to solve the problem. In 1990-1991, the proportion of women in the male (F / M) 0.47 Primary school enrollment. It was 0.74 in 1999-2000; show that the gender ratio has increased 57.44 percent during this decade. Average education level is 0.42 after 10 years, from 0.68 late 2010, rose nearly 62%. In both cases, small differences between the sexes, but relatively fast in the middle.

The gender gap in enrollment in secondary education and 0.4 in 1990-91 to 0.67 in 1999-2000, shows that the gap was 67.5% during this decade. At university level, 0.50 in 1990-91 to 0.81 in 1999-2000, shows that the gap has narrowed by 64%. The gender gap has declined more rapidly in secondary schools.

However, the impact of the gender gap in the application of the Taliban bans on female education in the Swat region, as reported in issue 21 January 2009 Pakistan Daily News. About 400 private schools enrolling 40,000 girls have been closed. At least 10 girls who tried to open the school after January 15, 2009 deadline for Taliban militants exploded the city of Mingora, Swat base. “More than 170 schools were destroyed or burned buildings and other countries.”

Education spending

As a percentage of GDP, Pakistan spent only 2.9% of the training. However, the government recently approved a new national education policy will result in access to education is 7% of GDP. One idea proposed by the Government of Punjab government. The plans to increase the 85% literacy 2015.In accordance with the Millennium Development Goal in Pakistan.

Posted in Environmental Education | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Different Standards In Education

Posted on May 15, 2012 by

Different Standards In Education

There is no common pattern for the whole set of standards for Western Australia. The South African standards show the same use of multiple types of levels for standards. For each of standard, the requirement is indicated for grades 10, 11, and 12. It is striking, though, that the South African materials have no progression for Learning Outcome 2. Technological Process. The standard document states: “The progression across the grades is reflected in the degree of complexity of the content in Learning Outcomes 3 and 4.” But those are Knowledge and Understanding and Application of Knowledge, so evidently no progression is defined for the process in which the knowledge is learned and used.

Looking at the whole set of South African standards, one soon finds that no attempt has been made to formulate progression for some of the other standards. In the standards for which progression has been formulated, the progression is often suggested by the word “describe” for lower grades and words like “discuss,” “explain,” and “analyse” for higher grades.

However, this is not done consistently, because in some cases we find “explain” in the lowest level also, and in some cases we find “understand” in the lowest level and “describe” in a higher level. In the Content-Contexts for the attainment of Assessment Standards, Learning Outcome I. Technology, Society and the Environment, for instance, we find “understanding of the issues of environmental technology” for Grade 10 and “describing of environmental technology” for Grade 11. One can question what the progression is here.

In general, the differences between levels are often marginal. Evidently, the South African materials are not quite clear about the use of levels for standards. In the French Standards we find four levels. Here they are not meant to indicate progression, however. Instead, they indicate to which level each of the standards has to be mastered. Some standards only have to be mastered at level 1, others at level 2, and so on. The four levels are defined as follows: I. Level of being informed (“knowing what one speaks about”); 2. Level of being able to express (“being able to talk about it”); 3. Level of application (“being able to do”); 4. Level of methodological mastery (“being able to choose, analyze, synthesize, and evaluate”). This reminds one vaguely of Bloom’s classic taxonomy, published originally in Handbook on Formative and Standards Evaluation of Student Learning (McGraw-Hill, 1971). These same levels are used for all standards. Of course, the practical meaning varies among standards, and for that reason each description is preceded by a short explanation of what “information,” “expression,” “outlines,” and “maitrise methodologique” (the four levels, as explained above) mean for that particular standard. In the Hamburg material, the behavioral terms are to be applied in three domains, which, in fact, represent levels. The first domain is reproduction of content in the context in which it was learned.

The second domain is transfer of the learned content to anew context. This requires that the learner choose the appropriate content for a complex problem in a different context from the one in which the content was learned. This seems to be the “from concrete to abstract” option for progression, as being able to transfer a concept from one context to another requires knowledge at a higher level of abstraction than being able to apply knowledge in a single context. Again there is some similarity with Bloom’s taxonomy. The table of operators (the behavioral terms used to indicate standards) shows on which level (domain) each standard has to be mastered. Here we see a combination of using levels for indicating progression (Level II is more demanding than Level I, and Level Ill is more demanding than Level II) and for indicating the required level of mastery for each standard.

The U.S. Standards for Technological Literacy clearly are most akin to the South African standards, which use a combination of approaches to indicate progress. Most of the other non-U.S. standards are based on a single approach, mostly “from concrete to abstract” or “from simple to complex.” With the combination of approaches, it is very difficult to consistently indicate what constitutes progression and to characterize overall progression. It may well be that in anticipation of these difficulties other countries have abstained from using more than one approach at a time to indicate progression. Learning things is not limited to the scentific area. Instead it also has relations with some other things like speaking a language or using software, including Rosetta Stone English and Rosetta Stone French. If you have a creative mind, you will make all your own differences in the end!

All of our viewers, if you want to learn more of things that are related to education and language learning, just click Rosetta Stone German and Rosetta Stone Hebrew.

Posted in Environmental Education | Tagged , , | Comments Off